檢視 使用者:GoodrichToussaint452 的原始碼
←
使用者:GoodrichToussaint452
前往:
導覽
,
搜尋
由於下列原因,您沒有權限進行 編輯此頁面 的動作:
您請求的操作只有這個群組的使用者能使用:
管理員
您可以檢視並複製此頁面的原始碼。
If your test or quiz on Intelligence Quotient is accordingly meant to appraise the intelligence of the individual, still one significant querry is still: What actually is intelligence? Does this refer to the power to perform well in class? Or does this simply refer to the competence of the individual to read well, write eloquently, and spell correctly? [http://www.parksmatch.org.uk/member.php?25887-EdwinRRobusto source here] Controversies regarding the exact definition of the word 'intelligence' are yet to be resolved. And even though you will find definitions from the said word as provided by dictionaries, still the issue lies in the morass of obscurity seeing that the word intelligence has not been sufficiently and properly delineated and for that reason no one really knows how much of an IQ quiz or test is assumed to appraise. However, even when there is an insufficiency of defining this term, but still the way forward for a number of youngsters are utterly based on the outcomes of this IQ test or quiz. [http://www.tilersforums.co.uk/members/39911.html example] Previously, during the early 1920s, the renowned correspondent named Walter Lippmann firmly argued that IQ quiz or tests were actually nothing but a sequence of stunts or aerobatics because according to him one may not and just quantify the intelligence of the individual especially when the word itself hasn't yet been clearly defined. However, during the year 1962, Banesh Hoffman revealed something that stunned the United states citizens concerning the "tyranny of testing" that they further elucidated in his classic book of the same title. This specific book, and also his other scholarly writings to come, drastically stirred up a number of controversy, which in fact had led the nation's Education Association in the year 1976 to highly suggest for the abolition of taking group standardized intelligence tests, aptitude tests, and even achievement tests. Furthermore, the nation's Education Association (NEA), having a huge number of members of roughly two million teachers, has called out for that elimination of standardized intelligence tests seeing that they are in their best, inefficient, and at their worst, detrimental. [http://www.tilersforums.co.uk/members/39911.html source here] These days, voices calling out for the abolition of standardized exams are not so many. One of these advocates is Linda S. Siegel, a professor in the Department of Special Education and academic Psychology in the University of Bc in Canada. Siegel strongly proposes the abandonment from the IQ test in analyzing the Learning Development or LD of a child. With different good number of definitions, intelligence is composed of skills than include problem solving, critical thinking, logical reasoning, and adaptation. This set-up appears undeniably impeccable and reasonable, not until somebody thoroughly scrutinizes the contents of IQ tests or IQ quizzes. As operationally used, the definition of intelligence virtually includes no skills which may be intrinsically identified in terms of the strict definitions of intelligence.
返回至
使用者:GoodrichToussaint452
。
導覽選單
個人工具
登入
命名空間
使用者頁面
討論
變體
檢視
閱讀
檢視原始碼
檢視歷史
更多
搜尋
導覽
首頁
基本資料
專案計劃
教授課程(本學期)
創意3D列印實務
程式設計
資料結構
WordPress
教授課程(所有)
資訊安全
科技英文
資料庫管理
管理專業英文
管理資訊系統
作業系統
專利與發明
程式設計
學生專題
網路概論
技術與學習
Delphi XE
3D印表機
SCJP考題
Arduino/pcDuino
Android
Linux/Unix
虛擬/雲端作業系統
網站功能
Wiki安裝設定筆記
隨機頁面
說明
工具
連結至此的頁面
相關變更
使用者貢獻
日誌
檢視使用者群組
特殊頁面
頁面資訊