檢視 GosnellElbert199 的原始碼

If a test or quiz on Intelligence Quotient is accordingly intended to appraise the intelligence of an individual, still one significant question remains: What actually is intelligence? Performs this make reference to the power to succeed in class? Or does this simply make reference to the competence of the individual to read well, write eloquently, and spell correctly?

[http://www.parksmatch.org.uk/member.php?25887-EdwinRRobusto source] 

Controversies as to the exact meaning of the word 'intelligence' are yet to be resolved. And even though you will find definitions from the said word as supplied by dictionaries, still the question is based on the morass of obscurity seeing that the term intelligence has never been sufficiently and properly delineated and so no one can tell what an IQ quiz or test is assumed to appraise. However, even if there is an insufficiency of defining this term, but nonetheless the future of numerous children are utterly determined by the outcomes of the IQ test or quiz.

[http://forum.travian.co.uk/member.php?52990-EdwinRRobusto click here] 

Previously, during the early 1920s, the renowned correspondent named Walter Lippmann firmly argued that IQ quiz or tests were actually nothing but a sequence of stunts or aerobatics because based on him one cannot really and just quantify the intelligence of an individual especially when the word itself has not yet been clearly defined.

However, in the past year 1962, Banesh Hoffman revealed something which stunned the American people about the "tyranny of testing" which he further elucidated in his classic book of the identical title. This specific book, and also his other scholarly writings that followed, drastically stirred up a number of controversy, which in fact had led the nation's Education Association around 1976 to highly suggest for that abolition of taking group standardized intelligence tests, aptitude tests, as well as achievement tests.

Furthermore, the nation's Education Association (NEA), using a huge number of members of roughly two million teachers, has called out for that elimination of standardized intelligence tests seeing that these are at their best, inefficient, and also at their worst, detrimental.

[http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/member.php?u=36281 visit website] 

These days, voices calling out for the abolition of standardized exams are not too many. One of these simple advocates is Linda S. Siegel, a professor in the Department of Special Education and academic Psychology in the University of Bc in Canada. Siegel strongly proposes the abandonment from the IQ test in analyzing the training Development or LD of the child.

Based on a good number of definitions, intelligence consists of skills than include problem-solving, critical thinking, logical reasoning, and adaptation. This set-up appears undeniably impeccable and reasonable, not until somebody thoroughly scrutinizes the items in IQ tests or IQ quizzes. As operationally used, the definition of intelligence virtually includes no skills which can be intrinsically identified with regards to the strict definitions of intelligence.