檢視 WithersWillard797 的原始碼
←
WithersWillard797
前往:
導覽
,
搜尋
由於下列原因,您沒有權限進行 編輯此頁面 的動作:
您請求的操作只有這個群組的使用者能使用:
管理員
您可以檢視並複製此頁面的原始碼。
If a test or quiz on Intelligence Quotient is accordingly meant to appraise the intelligence of an individual, still one significant question remains: What really is intelligence? Does this refer to the capability to succeed in school? Or does this simply refer to the competence of an individual to see well, write eloquently, and spell correctly? [http://www.nuisancecalls.org.uk/member.php?1153-EdwinRRobusto example] Controversies regarding the exact definition of the term 'intelligence' are yet to be resolved. And even though you will find definitions from the said word as supplied by dictionaries, still the question lies in the morass of obscurity simply because the word intelligence has not been sufficiently and properly delineated and so nobody can tell what an IQ quiz or test is assumed to appraise. However, even when it comes with an insufficiency of defining the said term, but still the way forward for a number of children are utterly determined by the final results of the IQ test or quiz. [http://forum.travian.co.uk/member.php?52990-EdwinRRobusto click here] Previously, during the early 1920s, the renowned correspondent named Walter Lippmann firmly argued that IQ quiz or tests were actually nothing but a string of stunts or aerobatics because according to him one cannot really and just quantify the intelligence of an individual especially when the term itself hasn't yet been clearly defined. However, during the year 1962, Banesh Hoffman revealed something which stunned the United states citizens about the "tyranny of testing" which he further elucidated in the classic book of the identical title. This particular book, and also his other scholarly writings to come, drastically stirred up a number of controversy, which had led the nation's Education Association in the year 1976 to highly suggest for the abolition of taking group standardized intelligence tests, aptitude tests, and even achievement tests. Furthermore, the National Education Association (NEA), having a large numbers of members of roughly two million teachers, has called out for that removal of standardized intelligence tests seeing that they are in their best, inefficient, and also at their worst, detrimental. [http://www.ourgermanshepherds.co.uk/members/edwinrrobusto.htm full url] These days, voices calling out for the abolition of standardized tests are not so many. One of these simple advocates is Linda S. Siegel, a professor in the Department of Special Education and academic Psychology at the University of Bc in Canada. Siegel strongly proposes the abandonment from the IQ test in analyzing the training Development or LD of a child. Based on a lot of definitions, intelligence consists of skills than include problem solving, critical thinking, logical reasoning, and adaptation. This set-up appears undeniably impeccable and reasonable, not until somebody thoroughly scrutinizes the contents of IQ tests or IQ quizzes. As operationally used, the definition of intelligence virtually includes no skills which may be intrinsically identified with regards to the strict definitions of intelligence.
返回至
WithersWillard797
。
導覽選單
個人工具
登入
命名空間
頁面
討論
變體
檢視
閱讀
檢視原始碼
檢視歷史
更多
搜尋
導覽
首頁
基本資料
專案計劃
教授課程(本學期)
創意3D列印實務
程式設計
資料結構
WordPress
教授課程(所有)
資訊安全
科技英文
資料庫管理
管理專業英文
管理資訊系統
作業系統
專利與發明
程式設計
學生專題
網路概論
技術與學習
Delphi XE
3D印表機
SCJP考題
Arduino/pcDuino
Android
Linux/Unix
虛擬/雲端作業系統
網站功能
Wiki安裝設定筆記
隨機頁面
說明
工具
連結至此的頁面
相關變更
特殊頁面
頁面資訊